Pieter du Toit’s The Dark Prince is an unflinching investigation into Paul Mashatile’s ascent from Alexandra township activist to the corridors of national power. Du Toit – a veteran News24 investigative journalist – paints Mashatile as the centre of a sprawling patronage network. The book traces a lifetime of loyalties: former schoolmates and struggle comrades who grew up together in Alexandra and now occupy key public posts. Its timing is notable: with Cyril Ramaphosa due to step down in 2029, Mashatile is widely seen as an ANC “crown prince” with presidential ambitions. In this context, Du Toit’s meticulous exposé matters today: it challenges readers to ask, as the author himself put it, “what networks” those in power bring with them.

“A Mashatile presidency carries ‘hues of darkness’.”

From Alexandra’s Struggle to National Spotlight

Du Toit begins with Mashatile’s humble origins. Born to a preacher in rural Gauteng, Mashatile moved to Alexandra township as a young man and “forged lifelong allegiances” in the heat of the anti-apartheid struggle. These bonds – with friends and fellow activists Mike Maile, Bridgman Sithole, Nkenke Kekana and (later) Mashatile’s close aide Keith Khoza – survived apartheid’s end. The author repeatedly notes their longevity: “there’s a golden thread of loyalty” still linking Mashatile to those comrades. By characterising Mashatile as “the quintessential party man, never straying from ANC dogma”, Du Toit argues that loyalty, not policy, has defined his career.

Arriving in free South Africa’s government ranks in the 1990s, Mashatile steadily climbed the ANC ladder. He served as Gauteng’s Finance MEC and later as national deputy president. Along the way, Du Toit documents how his Alexandra friends grew rich in tandem with his rise. Maile, Sithole, Kekana and Khoza – all former young guerrillas – were rewarded with plum appointments. Maile was made CEO of the Gauteng Shared Service Centre (answerable to Mashatile), Sithole and Kekana were given senior posts on government boards, and Khoza became Mashatile’s spokesman. Du Toit stresses that these allies “had access to state resources and were able to control the fortunes of government entities reporting in to Paul Mashatile”. In short, a clique formed in Alexandra now sat atop a network of patronage.

This story is not new to South African readers: long before Du Toit’s book, journalists noted the same actors. The Mail & Guardian in 2007 called Mashatile and his comrades Alexandra’s “young lions” who “battled apartheid’s security forces together” and later “evolved into corporate contacts, and sometimes contracts”. It detailed how Mashatile’s young daughter joined a firm that then won R20-million in state IT tenders during his tenure. Du Toit revisits these episodes and more, cataloguing expensive restaurant bills, luxury houses, and shared businesses. For example, between June 2005 and June 2006 Mashatile spent R163,000 at a five-star Sandton restaurant and once splurged R100,000 in a single day. He even rented a Cape Town mansion valued at nearly R29m. His book interleaves these details with factional politics, painting Mashatile’s story as a dark mirror to the Zuma-era patronage scandals.

The “Alex Mafia” Network

Central to The Dark Prince is Du Toit’s profiling of the so-called “Alex Mafia” – the tight-knit circle of Alexandra veterans. He explicitly names its core members: Mike Maile, Bridgman Sithole, Nkenke Kekana (all student activists) and Keith Khoza, among others. Du Toit argues these men were “hand-picked” by Mashatile for lucrative roles. Maile led the Shared Service Centre, Sithole and Kekana held directorships in Mashatile’s agencies, and even family and friends benefited from their proximity. Citing interviews and public records, Du Toit shows that many of their companies regularly won Gauteng contracts.

Du Toit’s narrative emphasises continuity between the struggle years and today: the loyalties forged in the Alexandra jail cells persisted into government. “They came up with Mashatile during the fight against apartheid. Those loyalties were forged at the height of the battle… and that’s why those links remain to this day,” he observes. The implication is clear: the very bond that freed South Africa now threatens to bind its future.

This “network” has broad political implications. By entrusting key budgets and appointments to friends, Mashatile is portrayed as having built a patronage machine. Du Toit warns that “certain individuals have leverage over Mashatile, which could sway his decisions if he were to lead the country”. The unstated suggestion is that his presidency might be compromised by these loyalty debts. In other words, Dark Prince posits that a leader’s associates are not neutral backers but power brokers. The Associated Press and News24 have similarly noted how Mashatile’s circle resembles a factional power base within the ANC – a modern clientelistic web born of a shared past.

Forensic Reporting or Speculation?

Du Toit’s investigative rigor is impressive. His book is packed with data: tenders, company records, emails and interviews. One reviewer calls it “meticulously researched”, even “the most comprehensive study available” of Mashatile. The author leaves no stone unturned, from pie charts of electoral returns to the minutiae of provincial budgets. He documents extravagances and conflicts of interest for instance, all four core “Alex Mafia” partners formed a holding company together in 2005, with disputed purposes.

Critically, however, the narrative is unabashedly adversarial. Du Toit’s tone is forensic but never neutral: every fact is presented with ominous overtones. Unsurprisingly, Mashatile’s camp has railed against the book’s premise. For example, a presidential spokesman dismissed allegations of an “Alex Mafia” siphoning R10 billion in public funds as “untruthful and libellous”. Du Toit acknowledges some denials – but typically to dismiss them as PR spin. The book never swings towards balance; it steers firmly toward suspicion.

This leads to some overreach. Certain claims hinge on unnamed sources or inference. Du Toit often moves from loyalty to allegation with only gossip for company. He quotes the obvious (“they were appointed to jobs”) but sometimes stretches the subtext (“so they must have paid back their friend”). Indeed, Mashatile’s allies once attempted to sue News24 for defamation over the “Alex Mafia” label, arguing it implies criminal collusion. A court observed that calling themselves the Alex Mafia “means they would not have been able to achieve their success without… a corrupt relationship” – an interpretation News24’s lawyer called “not probable”. Du Toit does not concede this point; to him, the nickname is telling, not slander.

The book is a finely knitted conspiracy web built of public hints. Readers are invited to connect the dots: a five-star dinner here, a board appointment there, a struggle-era friendship everywhere. For some, that will be persuasive; for others, Du Toit’s narrative reads more like a grisly gossip column for the politico-curious.

Verdict: Not the Final Word, but an Important One

The Dark Prince is not hagiography. Du Toit spares Mashatile little: “he conducts many of his dealings in the dark,” Du Toit warns, and “a Mashatile presidency carries hues of darkness”. He paints Mashatile as an enigma wrapped in rhetoric, a “dark horse” in ANC politics. In doing so, he has given us the clearest dossier yet on a man most South Africans scarcely knew.

One can fault the book for its one-eyed perspective and its reliance on inference. At times Du Toit’s prose underlines subtext more than it advances proof. Yet to his credit, the author has assembled every detail he could find into a coherent narrative. For readers, the net verdict must balance admiration for the homework done with skepticism about the leaps taken.

In sum, The Dark Prince is an indispensable contribution – just not the final chapter. It provides a trove of material for South Africa’s political watchers: the clan ties, the tavern tales, the tenders and tax records. As a dossier, it is unrivalled so far. But as an indictment, it can only hint. Du Toit’s slashing verdicts often outstrip his verifiable evidence.

Still, in a nation still wrestling with state capture and factionalism, The Dark Prince is a timely caution. It reminds us that the personal is political: the networks we ignore today may run our country tomorrow. For anyone wary of where South Africa’s succession politics might lead, Du Toit’s book is essential reading – a blinding spotlight, though not a court’s final judgment.

Subscribe now